Articles Comments

David Porter » Articles at Suite 101

Musicians of the 1960s: 21st Century Relevance and Respect

Leonard Cohen: Folk Poet Supreme - Rama
Many of those singer-songwriters, performers who used talents to launch careers four decades ago, can still speak with weighty voices to today’s youngsters.

Jack Madani’s Pop and Rock Music in the 60s: A Brief History gave a concise account of the main artists, the movers and shakers who led up to the explosion of 60s’ music. Starting with the roots of rock and roll, before the decade began, right up to the early 70s, when the dream began to unravel.

Many stars who shone, particularly in the late 60s, are no longer around for whatever reason. Their brightness has dimmed. Death took Janis Joplin, Jimmi Hendrix, Otis Redding, Marvin Gaye and John Lennon, for example. Who knows what they would have achieved musically if they had lived?

Others are still doing gig circuits, cashing in on their back catalogues to appeal to the nostalgia markets, and why not? Some such have new musical contributions to make, possibly politically and culturally, such as Pete Townsend of The Who and Ray Davies of The Kinks who re-recorded many of his 60s’ pop hits with the Crouch End Festival Chorus in 2009. A small band of others are legends whose new work is still eagerly anticipated because they are relevant in the early decades of the 21st century.

Bob Dylan and Leonard Cohen: Folk Poets

Often bracketed together by critics and commentators as folk poets, singer-songwriters, Dylan and Cohen were nonetheless, fundamentally different. Stephen Scobie, in Canadian Poetry 33 (Fall/Winter 1993) in a piece called ‘The Counterfeit Begs Forgiveness’ argued that if Dylan was the greatest song-writer of the age, ‘Leonard Cohen is still the only name that can seriously be mentioned in the same breath’.

Both Jewish in origin and associated with different religions as influences (Dylan’s Christianity; Cohen’s time as a Buddhist monk), both were arguably linked to political writing to some degree. Dylan denied he was a protest singer, but commentators still use his 1960s’ work, including A Hard Rain’s Gonna Fall, Oxford Town, Maggie’s Farm, Blowin in the Wind, Hurricane as examples of political performance. Cohen’s 1964 poetry collection, Flowers for Hitler, wove a strong subversive/political theme throughout.

In his book Dylan & Cohen: Poets of Rock and Roll (2004), David Boucher took Cohen’s own view that ‘poetry is a verdict rather than an intention, meaning it is others who bestow the title poem or poet’ to argue that both Dylan and Cohen are lyric poets. Both have been praised from time to time as less than wonderful singers, but in the totality of singing their own songs and performing, or others doing it for them, there is little argument that they are great singer-songwriters.

Cohen’s Hallelujah has been covered by enough artists to make it a classic. Dylan has had literally hundreds of his songs covered by others in so many genres. Being covered by others is a mark of respect (or simple commercial opportunism), but is not the only pointer towards greatness and career longevity.

Boucher citted the 1999 National Poetry Day studying the relationship between poetry and song lyrics, with the opening line to Dylan’s Visions of Johanna as a big favourite: ‘Ain’t it just like the night to play tricks when you’re trying to be so quiet’. The consensus was that ‘pop lyrics have their own integrity within the much broader texture of music, image, performance and attitude’.

Beatles, Stones and Solo Artistes

Paul McCartney, former Beatle and Wings lead, still sells out concerts, and his song Yesterday is described by the Guinness Book of World Records as ‘the most covered song ever written, with over 3000 versions’. It is reported that he thought of the melody in his head during a dream. With his time as one of the ‘fab four’ Beatles,1957-69, singing and co-writing songs that have survived in popular appeal, he would have made a mark sufficient on music history to be remembered. Since that time he has continued to be an important, significant and enduring presence in the music industry.

AskMen UK puts Mick Jagger, lead singer/leader of The Rolling Stones in the category of continued success story: ‘both by staying in the public’s imagination and by bringing the necessary energy and ambition needed to keep The Rolling Stones going’. They still make and sell albums, (22 studio ones to date), still sell out gigs, and when Jagger says or does something, even in his 60s, it still has newsworthiness envied by many who aspire to fame. He didn’t make much from The Stones’ 60s’ song success because of legal disputes, poor contracts and the customs of the times, but is reputed to be a canny businessmen.

Famous for a glamorous and controversial lifestyle, Rod Stewart had a scare when diagnosed with thyroid cancer, and the Oral Cancer Foundation painted a glowing testimony to the man’s career over four decades and charitable work as a result of his health. Interested in music, football and left wing politics, he had a chequered career before joining The Jeff Beck Group in 1966, The Faces and then a solo career, adapting his styles over the years, capitalising on a unique voice, writing some hits and reinterpreting others.

His work in the 2000s as spokeperson for cancer research, puts him in the league of charitable, semi-political musicians who have achieved global recognition and carry a lot of weight in the media, along with Bob Geldof, Bono, Bruce Springsteen and Natalie Maines of Dixie Chicks.

Welshman Tom Jones began in the pop industry in the 1960s, as a female-adored idol and in 2010, still able to sell out a long run in Las Vegas, he topped the album charts with a controversial collection of religious-based music, Praise and Blame. He still makes waves. Likewise, Van Morrison is acclaimed as one of music’s truly innovative artists, collaborating a popular blend of R&B, jazz, blues, and Celtic folk, who draws loyal fans from every age group, from those who remember him in Them, and those born long after.

It’s the mark of a great survivor in popular culture, that young people want to listen.

First published on Suite 101, 8 October 2010.

Photo: Leonard Cohen: Folk Poet Supreme – Rama

Read On

Filed under: Articles at Suite 101

Thought Experiments, Mind Games and Creativity

World Mind Sports Games, Beijing 2008 - Klaus Kopplinger
As thinking computers and self-propagating machines are virtually imminent, there is more than ever need for creative philosophical debate and questioning.

Between 1996-2003, director of the nonprofit group, Mind Justice, Cheryl Welsh received over 1,800 claims of mind control. She found “a strong case that the US, Russia, and major countries are developing and conducting classified mind control non-consensual experiments.” This issue is addressed by major legislatures, some human rights groups and the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR).

Her thesis considered cold war electromagnetic radiation and mind control weapons in the former USSR; previous experiments for weaponization; lack of legal protection for human subjects of state-secret experiments; and looked at various developments of ‘weapons to neutralize the enemy without killing’.

All governments like to contain/control people, inside its borders and out, and such matters have long since passed the realms of fiction, as in Nineteen-Eighty-Four (1948) and Brave New World (1932). Regular reports of torture, deprivation of basic human needs, abuse, neglect and terror fill the news media as much today as ever. That some people draw artistic inspiration from such matters is controversial but an economic and artistic fact.

Nazi experiments on Jews, gypsies, the handicapped, twins, are now well known. Did they experiment on left handedness or other ‘aberrations’? The full truth may emerge eventually, but in the meantime such horror, such experimentation on body, mind and soul is creatively rich material.

Philosophers’ Dilemmas

According to Julian Baggini in his book The Pig That Wants to be Eaten (2005): ‘Imagination without reason is mere fancy, but reason without imagination is sterile. That is partly why scientists and philosophers alike have always used imaginary scenarios to help sharpen their ideas and push them to their limits’.

Artists have freely drawn on the work of scientists, technologists and mathematicians, to produce paintings, photography, music, drama and movies. Baggini’s point is that where philosophy comes in, and in effect contributes to artistic endeavour, is in the use of ‘thought experiments’, to strip away things that complicate real life to focus on ‘the essence of a problem’.

The Pig That Wants to be Eaten itself was taken from Douglas Adams’ novel, The Restaurant at the End of the Universe (1980), in which a pig had been genetically engineered to speak and to want to be eaten. The idea allowed Baggini to open a debate about the morality involved in eating meat at all, and to offer the thought that it’s better than eating an animal that doesn’t want to be eaten. No answers; plenty to ponder and discuss.

The book looked at other dilemmas: ‘is anything so self-evident that it cannot be doubted?’ (from Descartes); ‘God is good; accepting uncritically received wisdom’ (from Plato); ‘are there unchangeable facts about anything?’ (from Hobbes); ‘thoughts do not cause anything in the physical world‘ (from TH Huxley); ‘all language use is a kind of game‘ (from Wittgenstein); the ancient paradox of Achilles and the Tortoise and a host of other enigmas, riddles and unanswerable questions of life’s meaning.

Thinking is a Skill

According to Brainist.com: ‘thinking is a skill and therefore it can be improved’. They urge people to practice activities that sharpen ability to perceive patterns and recognize problems, a key element in solving puzzles. Often people don’t know the solution to a puzzle because they can’t see the problem. By playing, practicing, and making mistakes, people learn and improve creativity. ‘Avoiding conceptual blocks can lead not only to successful problem solving but might result in great inventions’.

Nowadays it might be called ‘thinking outside the box’, but 1967 when he pioneered the concept, Edward de Bono’s ‘lateral thinking’ was revolutionary. He published the theory in The Use of Lateral Thinking in the UK, (it was New Think in the USA), and defined it in several ways, from the technical to the illustrative.

For instance, ‘You cannot dig a hole in a different place by digging the same hole deeper, means that more effort in the same direction or approach will not necessarily succeed’. The concept is concerned with the perception part of thinking: ‘We assume certain perceptions, certain concepts and certain boundaries. The brain as a self-organising information system forms asymmetric patterns. The tools and processes of lateral thinking are designed to achieve ‘lateral’ movement, such as provocation, are designed to help that change. It defines the mathematical need for creativity’.

His Parallel Thinking concept: ‘is best understood in contrast to traditional argument or adversarial thinking’. Here, each side takes a different side and seeks to prove the other wrong (Socrates, Plato and Aristotle started it). ‘Adversarial thinking completely lacks a constructive, creative or design element. It was intended only to discover the ‘truth’ not to build anything’.

De Bono got all sides to start thinking in parallel in co-operative and co-ordinated thinking. There doesn’t have to be agreement. Contradictory thoughts are laid down in parallel, and a way forward is ‘designed from the parallel thought’. He further designed the Six Hats of Thinking to help speed up thinking and because ‘it is so much more constructive then traditional argument-thinking’.

Mind Games and The Artistic Dimension

The movie Mind Games (2003) is about a woman suffering retrograde amnesia, forgetting the last seven months of her life. When a mysterious man tells her they’re married, her world unravels. Mind Game (2004) followed a young loser on a journey to heaven and back and being trapped in an unlikely place. The movie was described as ‘mind-bending’.

Inception (2010) was a ‘contemporary sci-fi action set within the architecture of the mind’. The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus (2009) was about a travelling theatre company that crossed into the surreal, darker fringes of the human mind/imagination. Films like Momento (2000), Deception (2008), Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004) and most psychological thrillers are highlights of clever imagining of others’ traumas.

Plays like Sleuth, many of JB Priestley’s time plays, TV series like The Prisoner (1967 and 2009) and the mathematical, mind-twisting artwork of MC Escher, all use the benefits of distorting ‘reality’, bending the mind’s certainties, questioning the norm and experimenting with people’s emotions and values, just as movements like surrealism and modernism/postmodernism play with values and perceptions. All in the name of creativity.

First published on Suite 101, 6 October 2010.

Photo: World Mind Sports Games, Beijing 2008 – Klaus Kopplinger

Read On

Filed under: Articles at Suite 101

Loyalty, An Old Fashioned Virtue Still Prized in Some Quarters

Scouts: Loyalty Is Expected - Sam Soneja
Has loyalty declined to merely a commercial exercise in customer building, or are some elements of fidelity still worth preserving today?

The Free Dictionary offers definitions of loyalty as ‘The state or quality of being loyal. A feeling or attitude of devoted attachment and affection. Often used in the plural: My loyalties lie with my family. A feeling of allegiance’. However, there is little agreement on what one can or cannot be loyal to. Other people, institutions, places of work, belief systems, the personal family, the extended family, the criminal family, sports teams, the government, the country: all engage philosophers, psychologists, sociologists, psychiatrists, marketing/media gurus, political theorists in debate.

At one end of the scale loyalty is patriotism; it’s antithesis is betrayal/treachery. It encompasses regimes regarded as odious (like Nazism, the wilder reaches of repressive Communism, dictatorships in general). It covers banks and financial institutions who choose to offer deals/bargains only to attract new customers, and ignore old, long-serving, loyal ones. It covers groups, cliques, clubs and cabals of like-minded peoplewho have behaviour codes.

The Philosophy of Loyalty

John Kleinig, Philosophy Professor at John Jay College and holding other distinguished offices in USA and Australia, is writing (2010) a book to be called Loyalty and Loyalties. He argued that the notion of loyalty is “an essential ingredient in any civilized and humane system of morals”. He further observed that from the 1980s onwards loyalism has also become attached to such issues as ‘professional ethics, whistle-blowing, friendship, and virtue theory.

In his book The Limits of Loyalty (2007) Simon Keller, from Universities at Boston and Melbourne said,. ‘We prize loyalty in our friends, lovers, and colleagues, but loyalty raises difficult questions. What is the point of loyalty? Can the requirements of loyalty conflict with the requirements of morality?’ He concluded that loyalty is an essential but fallible part of human life, and dealt with filial duty, disloyalty, patriotism, ethics, friendship and belief and posed the questions: is loyalty a value? is it a virtue?

He suggested that people act out of loyalty, venerate something, treat it with respect, follow its orders or act as its advocate. However, ‘it is also a matter of how you think, and how you are motivated. If you are loyal to something, then thoughts of it may inflame your passions, it may be something towards which you feel warmth and affection, and you may be saddened by thoughts of its suffering or demise’.

People think of something as their own, like a country or flag, which affects judgments, commitments and imaginations. Loyalty, in short, helps to define who people are with their identities, morals and finally Fuller wondered if ‘just because something counts as a loyalty, there is something good about it’.

Creativity Uses Fidelity

Staying loyal, betraying trust are natural elements of creative literature, movies, plays and dramas generally. There is a rich source of inspiration in fidelity, or infidelity. Loyalties (Double Allegiance) is a British Canadian drama film shot in 1986. There was an earlier one in 1933, starring Basil Rathbone. There is a 1985 novel with the name by Raymond Williams.

It is the concepts behind loyalty that have inspired creatives down the ages. From the Bible, with its account of Cain killing his brother Abel when family loyalty might be expected to rise above rivalry, to the wider Christian belief that loyalty is owed to a proper authority (‘Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s’), but loyalty to God is paramount.

Library Thing tag books based around some aspect of the loyalty theme, ranging from Charlotte’s Web, through the Harry Potter stories, The Yellow Star, The Hobbit and JD Robb’s Loyalty in Death through to The Loyalty Effect: The Hidden Force Behind Growth, Profits, and Lasting Value by Frederick F. Reichheld, which is creative from a business perspective.

A selection of movies tagged with loyalty include the Harry Potter stories (2001+), of course, plus Toy Story 1 (1995) and 2 (1999), Kill Bill 2 (2004), Reservoir Dogs (1992), Casablanca (1942), Pulp Fiction (1994), Stand By Me (1986) and Dead Poets Society (1989). Fancast has a different list, which includes We Own the Night (2007), Blood & Chocolate (2007), Jailhouse Rock (1957), The Remains of the Day (1993), The Painted Veil (1934), Band of Angels (1957) and Hachi-Ko (1987).

The Loyalties of Immigrants

In 2010, David Laskin of the History News Network wrote about Immigrant Loyalties During the Great War and Today. ‘Italians, Poles and Jews, the three largest groups of newcomers during the peak years of immigration at the turn of the last century, arrived in the United States with deep cultural traditions, fervent religious beliefs, great expectations, and a hunger to succeed. One thing these groups did not bring with them from Europe was a strongly developed sense of national allegiance to their countries of origin’.

Laskin wondered why these people so enthusiastically embraced national loyalty to the USA, enlisting, voting, becoming part of the fabric of US life. He submitted that the answer was opportunity (jobs and economic freedom, social fluidity, human/civil rights and military service: acceptance). Both world wars, with American drafting of servicemen, led to some home country conflicts, as for many around the world, but the fact remains, in essence, loyalty to the adopted country took over. A new loyalty was born.

This assimilation has remained largely true. The Irish Republican Army (IRA) was part funded by Irish base-nationality Americans at the end of the twentieth century was more due to misunderstanding the nature of their terrorism than a forging of totally new pro-Irish/anti-British loyalty, though some individuals may have felt that.

Loyalty programmes, like those offered by many airlines and hotel groups, supermarkets and other stores, are just ways of buying loyalty. The muddying of old, once-deep political allegiances in the past fifty years, between Republican and Democrat empathies in the US and Conservative and Labour in Britain, demonstrates that old fashioned, tribal loyalties can no longer be taken for granted. But they are important historically and culturally.

First published on Suite 101, 2nd October 2010.

Photo:  Scouts: Loyalty Is Expected – Sam Soneja

Read On

Filed under: Articles at Suite 101

Male Baldness Need Be No Barrier to Success in Life

Bruce Willis: Bald Star - Caroline Bonarde Ucci
In an age of image obsession, technology to change appearances and to fight aging, strangely, baldness can be an asset, inspiring confidence and authority.

There is an entire website devoted to famous baldies, or follicularly-challenged/hair disadvantaged as political correctness would have it, which lists, among many, bald actors (John Malkovich, Yul Bryner, Patrick Stewart, Telly Savalas); African Americans (Samuel L Jackson); musicians (Sinead O’Connor, Moby, Elton John); politicians (Winston Churchill, Gorbachev); and sportspeople (Duncan Mayhew, Michael Jordan). Clearly, in no way can their lack of hair have meant any shortfall in success during their careers.

Bald Men Facing Fashion Issues

In the article Embrace Your Baldness in 5 Steps, AskMen UK advised fashion conscious worried balding men to “embrace their baldness.” It said that “Michael Jordan made it cool for black men and Bruce Willis paved the way for white guys,” and offered five easy steps to dealing with it. First, they suggested men “assess the fallout damage.” see how bad the loss was; then accept it. Get over the denial, anger, bargaining with God, the depression and find acceptance. “Realise that in life, hair is a privilege, not a right.”

They strongly urged men to resist covering it up with whatever artificial means was to hand, or wasting money on solutions that may look ridiculous. Shaving the head may be an answer in fashion terms, that is, a complete razored shave, moving down with the grain. Finally, they recommended getting over the comments and maintaining proper upkeep, washing regularly, moisturising, protecting the head from sunburn. “Are you man enough to own your baldness?”

The site suggested a shaved head can make a man look younger, more hip, cooler, in control and tough. Ideal in business, media, creative, sports environments. The singer Elton John for years was unable to face facts, and used wigs and hats. In the end, it did his career no harm. Those who employ the “comb-over,” putting a few remaining strands across the pate in a vain attempt to hide the truth, are usually mocked.

It would appear that for most men in the public eye, hair loss is not a disaster. Some thought British politician William Hague gained gravitas and credibility in proportion to the widening visibility of his cranium. For others who really can’t face it, wigs and extensions are as commonplace as hair colourings and makeovers (teeth, skin, breasts). Hundreds of businesses have evolved selling products to stem hair loss, to repair damaged hair, to make hair grow where a head has become barren. Some may work; many cannot possibly make much difference.

The Medical Facts on Hair Loss

Hair loss causes differ between men and women, according to article Hair Loss in Men and Women on MedicineNet. They reckon losing 100-150 hairs per day is normal, and that hair grows in three phases: anagen (active growing phase), catagen (hairs begin to break down) and telogen (resting or late phase, getting ready for shedding).

They also state that hair loss is affected by predetermined genetic factors more often than health conditions, and that life variations like “temporary severe stress, nutritional changes, and hormonal changes like those in pregnancy, puberty and menopause may cause reversible hair loss.” Chemotherapy causes hair loss and there may be connections with skin, nails, thyroid, iron deficiencies too.

Most of the purveyors of hair loss treatments cite medical diagnoses and solutions, but thorough scientific research is not widely available into their efficacy. Men are more likely to accept it as an inevitable consequence of advancing years, if their father or grandfather experienced it either as receding hairline or full wipeout. It can happen relatively young. Prince William, born in 1982, has thinning patches in much the same away as his father Prince Charles did at the same age.

Baldness in History

Historical accounts of hair loss reveal it an ancient problem, according to the website StopHairLossNow.com. There are mentions in the Bible about it. In Kings 2:23 Elisha is mocked by youths: “Go on up, you baldhead,” he called a curse and two bears mauled 42 of them. Leviticus 13:40-41 said that when a man has lost his hair and he is bald, he is clean. In Numbers 6:1-21, we read the Nazarites had special rules regarding treatment of hair.

Samson never cut his hair as a sign of God’s strength, until he confided the fact to Delilah who allowed the Philistines to cut it and destroy his power. Grey hair is “a crown of splendour” in Proverbs 16:31 and 20:29. In the Middle East, hair loss was generally regarded as shameful. In Ancient Egypt, wigmakers were important workers, and a remedy for hair-loss survives: “Toes-of-a-Dog, Refuse-of-Dates, Hoof-of-an-Ass.”

During the centuries in ancient civilisations, fashions see-sawed from shaven heads, to wigs, to full beards, moustaches only, long hair, cropped hair. Variously Persians, Hittites, Celts, Greeks, Romans have regarded whatever they didn’t do as laughable, contemptible, absurd, a sign of weakness or merely unfashionable. In 400BC, Hippocates (The Father of Medicine: doctors still take the Hippocratic oath) prescribed “a mixture of cumin, pigeon droppings, horseradish and beetroots or nettles, to prevent hair loss.”

It’s reported that “Eunuchs are castrated males (had their testicles removed), and if this was done before puberty they do not go bald.” In later cultures “wigs were worn mainly by women, then in 1624 Louis XIII of France launched the era of the ‘big wig’ – by wearing one,” Some believe Shakespeare was bald. Wearing of wigs by barristers and judges is a historical hangover from the times when gentlemen wouldn’t leave home without one.

Oliver Cromwell, leading his Roundheads against Cavalier royalists in the English civil war, wore a wig. The taking of scalp, practised by some North American native Indian tribes, is believed to stem from an understanding they were taking the strength of their enemies to themselves.

Undoubtedly, hair, whether we have it or have lost it, is vital to us. The musical Hair celebrated long hair as sign of youthful rebellion. The irony is that those hippies of the 1960s are now bald or balding.

First published on Suite 101, 1st October 2010.

Photo: Bruce Willis: Bald Star – Caroline Bonarde Ucci

Read On

 

 

Filed under: Articles at Suite 101

My Brother’s Keeper: The Reality of Filial Affection

JFK and His Mother: Strong Family Ties - US Federal Government
Brotherly love is often used as justification for all sorts of loyalties, sacrifices, pressures and decisions, but is blood thicker than water in the end?

Ed Miliband grabbed the leadership of the British Labour Party in September 2010 from under the nose of his older brother, David. He was not predicted to win, but did by a wafer-thin margin. It excited the media, made people wonder about ambition and brothers and exposed family divisions to public gaze.

Trades Union members traditionally call each other ‘brothers’, as an equalizing, left-wing address, so no one is of higher importance than another. A joke runs that they hug and pat each others’ backs only to find the best spot to put the dagger in.

In Christianity, ‘brothers and sisters in Christ’ speaks to the belief that all men/women are created equal before God. In monastic culture, monks have been called ‘Brothers’, while ‘brothers in arms’ refers to fellow soldiers who are fighters/defenders.

Biblical Brothers

According to New World Encyclopedia, Cain and Abel, the sons of Adam and Eve, were recorded: ‘in the Torah and the Bible at Genesis 4, and Qur’an at 5:27-32, telling of the first human murder when Cain killed Abel. Many religious faiths view this as the prototypical murder and paradigm for conflict and violence. While some see this as a story of the origin of humanity, and others as justification of murder, it’s generally interpreted as a tragedy in human relationships. Cain and Abel often represent different personality types or social positions. Cain, the firstborn, sinful, worldly, privileged, a farmer, a city-builder and bad son; Abel, the junior, faithful, spiritual, herdsman, and good son.

Another brother story recounted in the Bible, is of twins Esau and Jacob born after their mother was told that her older son would serve the younger. This was unusual in those times, as elder brothers inherited wealth and power. Esau was born first, covered with red hair, and when Jacob followed, his hand was holding Esau’s heel.

Later, Esau sold his birthright to his sibling for a bowl of food, and Jacob tricked his aged father into blessing him instead of Esau. After that, Esau vowed to kill his upstart brother, so the mother sent the younger away to live with a relative. Both men prospered, but in the New Testament passage of Hebrews 12:16, Esau is described as immoral and unreligious. Romans 9:10-13 indicates God chose Jacob as heir to the promises that he’d made to his grandfather, Abraham.

Brothers in Politics

The Milibands are but the latest brotherly pair to hit the news and the political stage. For generations, the Kennedy family has been a dominant force in US national and local politics. Who2? described the entire ‘Clan Kennedy’, stating that when John F Kennedy became President in 1961, ‘he also became leader of America’s top political clan. The Kennedys have been called America’s “royal family” as JFK’s brothers, sisters, children, nieces and nephews took major roles in American public life’. It points out that some view the Bush family as more significant, but there were far more Kennedys in influential positions.

John F Kennedy, assassinated in 1963, had two younger brothers. Robert, his 1960 campaign manager, served as Attorney General, was a senator and ran for the Presidency himself before being assassinated in 1968. Edward ‘Ted’ was a senator and stayed till he died in 2009. His career was frequently troubled by controversy, but with other members of the family by birth or marriage involved in community politics, (Patrick, Eunice Kennedy Shriver, Arnold Schwarzenegger), their place in US history as an iconic family is assured.

On the one hand, a touching magazine photo of the President playing with his 3 year old daughter Carolineinspired the naming of the famous UK 1960s’ pirate radio ship; and on the other, the ‘Kennedy curse’ of death by accident and murder make filial love enduringly fascinating.

The closeness of the family was undeniable; loyalties profound. David Talbot, in his book Brothers: The Hidden History of the Kennedy Years (2007) interviewed 1250 people involved with the Kennedy Presidency to forward a theory that Bobby Kennedy was convinced that a Mafia/CIA/Cuban exiles conspiracy killed his brother.

Brothers in Fiction

The Corleones in The Godfather (novel 1969; movies 1972 onwards) epitomised both the family bonds, traditions and loyalties of the (fictional) mafia, and how brotherly love may not be enough to ensure survival. Michael Corleone had two older brothers, the hot-headed Sonny who was gunned down by rivals, and Freddie, the less able, more easily (mis)led one. After their father had passed away, Michael had Freddie shot while out fishing on the family lake as he had betrayed the family in a previous assassination attempt on the old man. It tortured him for the rest of his life, that he killed his own brother.

The Brothers Karamazov by Dostoevsky (novel 1879/80; film 1958) is described by Online Literature as exploring ‘the big questions of life through the story of a highly dysfunctional “family”: three sons basically neglected and abandoned by their father Fyodor’. Other pieces of fiction featuring brotherly tensions include Cutting for Stone by Abraham Verghese (2010), a family saga about twin brothers, doctors and patients, exile and home set in Africa and America.

Nora Roberts’ Quinn Brothers trilogy was described by Publishers Weekly as ‘a trio of strapping, lusty guys in a comfortable home on Maryland’s Eastern Shore’. It called Roberts ‘one of the great propagandists for family values, home, hearth and children, making them goals that are rewarding and desirable’.

Library Thing lists dozens of brotherly novels, including: Anansi Boys by Neil Gaiman: East of Eden by John Steinbeck; The Client by John Grisham; Leif Enger’s Peace Like a River; White Night by Jim Butcher, The Beach House by James Patterson and Harlan Coben’s Gone for Good.

There is Tangerine by Edward Bloor and Ordinary People by Judith Guest; Fudge-a-Mania and Double Fudge by Judy Blume; No Great Mischief by Alistair MacLeod, The Apocalypse Watch and The Gemini Contenders by Robert Ludlum and The Closed Circle by Jonathan Coe. Thomas Hardy did The Trumpet-Major, Wilbur Smith did Monsoon and Jeffrey Archer offered Sons of Fortune.

He also wrote Kane and Abel, a variation on the Biblical epic of Cain and Abel. In pop music, brothers frequently work together (Ray and Dave Davies in The Kinks; the Gallagher boys in Oasis). Other groups liked to cash in on the cosy image of siblings in harmony, such as the 1960s Walker Brothers, 3 men who were not related to each other.

Either way, many people like to claim a brother or two. As the old Scott-Russell song went: He ain’t heavy, he’s my brother’.

First published on Suite 101, 29 September 2010.

Photo: JFK and His Mother: Strong Family Ties – US Federal Government

Read On

Filed under: Articles at Suite 101

If UK Politics are Pure Theatre, Politicians are the Performers

 

Blair Playing The Straight Guy - World Economic Forum
There are political performances, theatre as politics and the politics of theatre. But there is also politics as pure theatre, good value entertainment.

Roll up, roll up for the greatest piece of taxpayer-funded performance theatre outside the West End or the three-ring circus. It’s the arena, the bear-pit that is the British House of Commons and other small stages in and without the village of Westminster, so beloved of politicos through the ages. Usually without the singing and dancing, such performance leads some people to wonder about the wisdom of both allowing and paying for public ‘torture’.

In 1978 British parliamentary sketch writer Norman Shrapnel published The Performers: Politics as Theatre, in which he said: ‘Parliament as theatre is a conception some find distasteful …. even the most histrionic of our politicians find it necessary to maintain that politics are vastly more important than personalities…’ Shrapnel’s point is that politics and personality cannot be separated, personalities dominate the political stage.

He wrote about the aged, mobility-impaired Winston Churchill, long past his prime, even entering the Commons to take his seat as ‘a performance of great complexity’. Churchill revelled in put-downs till the end, especially against Labour giant orator, Aneurin ‘Nye’ Bevan; and both men ‘stabbed and clubbed each other with parliamentary language’.

Shrapnel described ‘the masks of Macmillan’; the ‘seeming ordinariness’ of Harold Wilson; the amateur orchestra conductor Edward Heath; the controversial Enoch Powell, the Labour MP/actor who denounced him the most, Andrew Faulds; and ‘clowning Hamlet’ George Brown, among hosts of 1960s and 70s parliamentary performers.

Actors, Luvvies; Elected Politicians

Since Shrapnel identified the phenomenon, the media has taken up the styling of performances in the House of Commons, in television studios, on the impromptu, alfresco studio of College Green opposite the Commons, or on the street, as various kinds of theatre. John Major’s 1992 General Election campaign saw him produce a ‘soapbox; at every stop, to raise him above the crowd and allow him to hold forth, although his voice was not gifted for public declamation. Laughed at by the media as mad, it proved successful in the 1992 election, but flopped in a rerun in 1997.

Ian Flintoff writing in the New Statesman Feb 2004, observed that as an actor himself he ‘couldn’t help testing the stage skills of politicians. It is said that they are all actors. Not so. Most are histrionically challenged, and many media commentators haven’t much of a clue about what makes a fine performance’. Flintoff pointed at William Hague as the best performer of the time, ‘perfect vocal, half-smile showed total control, whimsy’.

Other politicians are praised or damned by journalists as too dramatic, too timid, too reliant on script, poor improvisers, bad deliverers of jokes, too intimidating, too whatever. Some come into politics already thespians, like Glenda Jackson, Labour MP and formidable actress. Some go on to have public arena lives after the Commons, such as David Mellor, Edwina Currie, Michael Portillo, Gyles Brandreth, Matthew Parris from the Conservatives and Brian Walden and Robert Kilroy-Silk from Labour into radio/TV/media punditry, commentating, quiz programmes and game shows.

Some do it while they’re still in Parliament, despite very heavy workloads in Parliament and constituencies, such as Charles Kennedy on Have I Got News For You and George Galloway who excruciatingly made a fool of himself on a celebrity version of TV’s Big Brother in 2006, and. Sebastian Coe entered the House of Lords after a Commons stint and headed up the London 2012 Olympics.

Tony Blair, Consummate Actor

UK Prime Minister Tony Blair 1997-2007 has a special place in the pantheon of British politico-actors. There is a sketch played by Catherine Tate in which she portrayed a stereotypical teenage work experience student, and Prime Minister Blair played along as himself. It’s very funny and confirmed what many people suspected, that Blair would have been at home on the stage all his career.

In 2007, Fiona Mountford of London’s Evening Standard described a new show Tony! The Blair Musical, as ‘the always-welcome genre of political satire making something of a comeback’. A Prime Minister more famous/popular in the USA than his time after office has been judged in the UK, is going to be the subject of many spoofs, documentaries, plays, dramas, musicals and other forms of political entertainment and exaggeration, but Blair didn’t perform in it.

Publishing a biography of the man in 2007, Earth Times London said he ‘combined natural charm, rebellion and zeal to become one of the most powerful and controversial figures on the world stage’. He was ‘a talented actor at school’, who went on to study law, front various music bands, stood for Parliament and developed personality traits that served him well for most of his time in Downing Street.

Andrew Rawnsley of The Observer, May 2006, described Blair as ‘another actor-manager of a Prime Minister who is wearing greasepaint that has worn thin’. The Daily Mail, January 2010, after his appearance at the enquiry into the Iraq war, called him: ‘a fantasist living in a parallel universe. Polished, slippery and unrepentant as ever, the most accomplished actor-politician of our time adjusts the facts of history to fit the Gospel according to Tony Blair’.

British author and journalist Mark Simpson, said: ‘He’s an actor – an actor of the Stanlislavsky school: the emotion he shows us is ‘true’, it’s just usually attached to something that is not. This is why he’s such a great performer and politician – we appreciate and are flattered by the energy and the psychosis he puts into his performances. He is a great manipulator…’.

Really, though, why shouldn’t the worlds of politics and entertainment overlap, if not actually collide? For both professions/art forms, admiration/applause/approbation is the lifeblood, publicity the oxygen and fame the spur.

First published on Suite 101, 28 September 2010.

Photo: Blair Playing The Straight Guy – World Economic Forum

Read On

Filed under: Articles at Suite 101

Universities of Tomorrow May be Entirely in Cyberspace

 Future Education from Cyberspace? - Grj23
As higher education costs rocket, technology advances apace, everybody could soon get a degree online from home. But it would mean a major cultural shift.

All economies under stress, as most of the world’s are in 2010, look to reduce expenditure and raise revenue. Universities have long ceased to be ivory towers, above such grubby concerns. As debate polarises around student fees/debt, quality and range of degree curricula, and young adults decide for financial/debt reasons, not to go away for 3 or so years, it’s time to wonder if future universities are almost entirely on-line, but harnessing an old idea.

Correspondence Courses: An Idea That Worked

Correspondence courses are old fashioned. They have been around, in Britain certainly, for over 200 years and were a means for people to improve their minds, gain qualifications they wouldn’t ordinarily have had or to enhance a hobby or interest. Isaac Pitman offered typing lessons from a distance in the 1840s. The University of London first offered a degree through an external programme in 1858, and after that the development of postal services ensured success for such ventures.

“Home Study” took off, a continuation of the British Victorian ethic of hard work and self-improvement, as in adult evening classes and education institutes. May’s Correspondence College, headquartered in east London, was founded in 1894 and was still going in the late 1970s. Students worked through a book or folder of instruction, tackled set tasks, and posted work to a tutor who marked and returned.

Today there are thousands of modern equivalents of correspondence colleges across the world, teaching everything from mathematics, business, accounting, architecture, management, English, other languages, any of the “ologies” (sociology, psychology, philosophy), journalism and writing, Bible studies, history, astronomy and art appreciation. The Association of British Correspondence Colleges keeps a membership list.

While remote areas of Australia, Canada and other countries have long had Radio of the Air, or televised lessons for children and young people miles from population centres, learning where teacher and student are not simultaneously together in time and space could become the norm for post-school learning.

A pioneer of learning from home was the UK’s Open University, founded in 1969. It has maintained an open-entry policy, whereby prior qualifications are not taken into account for entry. Most courses are delivered from a distance, with around 180,000 students enrolled, including 25,000 studying outside the UK. It has graduated more than 3 million people, most of whom have rated it highly.

It has accreditation in the USA and has been modelled around the world with Open Universities from the Philippines and Israel to Hong Kong. Whether people are able/disabled, literate, highly technological or not, more can access the learning than by almost any other educational style.

Distance Education: A Buzz, Now Idea

“Distance Learning” is up to the minute. It delivers teaching/learning, information or exam training to people who are not physically present, (a bit of a problem in subjects like drama and the performing arts) but can access materials online or by mobile phone technology. This is one-to-one teaching, or small group seminars; or it may be written modules on screen or paper, which are marked and returned, by the same principle as the old correspondence colleges.

Most universities now offer distance education as an alternative route to graduation, and it serves a number of socio-economic benefits. It allows education to reach populations (remote or impoverished) who would otherwise have no access. It can work out cheaper. The BBC reported a survey in August 2009 that suggested new students at British universities faced an average debt of over £23,000 after studying for a three year degree.

May Pullian Weston of the Los Angeles Times wrote in May 2010 about the concern that graduate debt could harm mortgage applications in a regime of tighter lending controls. A US project on student debt in the 2008 year class found average deficit per graduate rising about 6% pa, from $20,000 average for seniors, to over $100,000 for some college graduates. And this in a time of soured employment prospects for the young.

This coincides with a time of reductions in overall public expenditure. Distance learning demands smaller staffing than traditional teaching, and the income from students is as welcome to institutions as from those who come to stay.

Contemporary enthusiasm for “lifelong learning,” means that older people, who may or may not have had university education when younger, can join and learn. Many seniors are happy as “silver internet surfers,” so adult education by web comes as second nature. As people live longer, more healthy and active lives, the demand for education in its broadest sense is relentless. New technologies and changing attitudes to formalised centres of learning mean that distance learning may enable institutions to keep up to date.

The plight of just one graduate seeking first work in a recession, was highlighted by Beth Lattin in 2009. The system of student loans with apparently low interest rates and no requirement to repay until a certain income level is achieved, means that generations of British young people shoulder debts for their higher education that can never be repaid. Except, ultimately, by the taxpayer.

If there is a cultural shift and most students tomorrow stay home to study, there will be adverse effects on social economies (entertainment, food, drink, accommodation) in student communities, possibly on students’ own social skills development and the last thing a world driven by computers wants is more isolated people.

However, things can not stay as they have been.

First published on Suite 101, 25 September 2010.

Photo: Future Education from Cyberspace? – Grj23

Read On

Filed under: Articles at Suite 101

Shakespeare’s Ideas: What Have They Done to the Bard?

Forbidden Love: West Side Story/Romeo & Juliet - Smatprt
Long regarded as an icon of English cultural history, Shakespeare’s works have been subjected to more adaptation on stage and film than almost anybody else.

In January 2010 Chicago news reporter, Karen Meyer, wrote about disability issues in some of Shakespeare’s plays: not a topic much thought about by Shakespearean purists. Books, articles, theses, even cartoons and manga-style comics about Shakespeare and his folklore, magic, feminism, history-apology and patriotism abound, sitting alongside studies of his language, poetry, vocabulary, foreign words, invented terms and phrases that have become international quotations.

However, it’s how his work has been interpreted and adapted that causes people to restate that ‘in their view Shakespeare can only be done in Elizabethan costume,’ with the same lyrical poetry as the original, not, for example modernised (like putting Titus Andronicus into 21st century Iraq).

Others take different views. English is a living language; a play from the past can be revisioned for today with a message still relevant; times change, views change. So an all-female cast is acceptable, albeit unthinkable in the 16th century. UK actress Helen Mirren turned Prospero in The Tempest into Prospera, a female spright in the 2010 movie. In the words of Lady Macbeth (Act 3, Sc 2): ‘What’s done, is done.’

Shakespeare in the Movies

Shakespeare’s themes of murder, ambition, revenge and betrayal, often with a rewrite of history, are the stuff of good fiction, powerful movies. Romeo and Juliet became the stage and film versions of West Side Story (1956). The Taming of the Shrew became the musical, Kiss Me Kate (musical 1958, movie 1953) and the film 10 Things I Hate About You (1999), starring Julia Stiles and Heath Ledger. The two minor, but significant characters from Hamlet were leads in Tom Stoppard’s play, Rosencrantz and Guildernstern Are Dead (1966, movie 1990).

Absolute Shakespeare lists over 250 Shakespeare movies, adaptations and Shakespeare-inspired works, saying ‘they are so numerous, they form their own sub genre’, proving that the man, his works and the productions have enduring appeal.

Hamlet alone has seen, according to Absolute Shakespeare: ‘sixty one film adaptations and twenty one TV adaptations, the earliest in 1907 and the latest in 2000’. Other notable commitments to celluloid include: The Taming of the Shrew, (1929), featuring Douglas Fairbanks and Mary Pickford; Romeo and Juliet, (1935), directed by George Cukor. Laurence Olivier directed Henry V (1945), Hamlet (1948), Richard III (1955). 1948’s Macbeth and 1952’s Othello were directed by Orson Welles, of War of the Worlds fame.

Forbidden Planet (1956), directed by Fred M Wilcox was based on The Tempest. Throne of Blood / The Castle of the Spider’s Web / Cobweb Castle (1957) were derived from Macbeth in Japan. A TV movie of 1960 was The Tempest, starring Richard Burton, and he starred again in 1964’s Hamlet, and in 1967’s Taming of the Shrew with Elizabeth Taylor, directed by Zeffirelli.

Shakespeare Attracts Star Directors and Actors

Zeffirelli did Romeo and Juliet in 1968 and Hamlet in 1991 and was one of many famous, top-class directors who have put on Shakespeare on film in every conceivable style. Peter Brook did King Lear (1970), Roman Polanksi tackled Macbeth in 1972, Trevor Nunn and John Schofield did Anthony & Cleopatra in 1974, and Nunn teamed with Philip Casson in 1978 to direct The Comedy of Errors, starring Judi Dench and Francesca Annis.

The Godfather was Scorsese’s 1972 homage and Ran was Akira Kurosawa’s 1985 take on King Lear, which was redone by Jean-Luc Godard in 1987. Kenneth Branagh kick-started his Shakespearean movie career in 1989 with Henry V, and then did Hamlet (1996) with Richard Attenborough and Judi Dench and himself starring, Much Ado About Nothing in 1993, and Love’s Labours Lost in 2000. Trevor Nunn came back in 1996 with Twelfth Night, starring Helena Bonham-Carter, Nigel Hawthorne, Imogen Stubbs, Ben Kingsley and Mel Smith.

Romeo and Juliet was a hit in 1990, with Annis, Kingsley and Vanessa Redgrave, and in 1998, was given a fictional makeover suggesting how Shakespeare wrote it, in Shakespeare in Love, starring Gwyneth Paltrow and Joseph Fiennes. Baz Lurhman had the novel idea of setting it in modern, gang-culture America, but keeping original Shakespearean dialogue in his 1996 hit film.

This was the same gimmick employed by Michael Almereyda in his Hamlet 2000, starring Kyle MacLachlan, Bill Murray, Julia Stiles and Ethan Hawke. Set in contemporary New York, it deployed modern technology/surveillance equipment, but retained Shakespeare’s language.

Peter Greenaway’s Prospero’s Books (1991) based on The Tempest, broke new ground with off-screen narration and animation with mime, dance and opera. Michael Hoffman put Michelle Pfiffer and Calista Flockhart in his version of A MIdsummer’s Night’s Dream of 1999.

Shakespeare as Marketing Strategy

BBC TV produced Hamlet in 1980, The Merry Wives of Windsor (1982), besides complete sets of the 37 plays over the years reflecting changing contemporary tastes, and now has a website with games, quizzes, competitions and 60-second bite sized chunks of the Bard.

Looking for Richard (1996) was Al Pacino’s directorial debut. It was a performance of selected scenes from Richard III, and a documentary looking at Shakespeare’s continuing relevance in popular culture.

People have been asking questions about the man ever since he died, 23 April 1616, his believed birthday (St. George’s Day in England). Questions include: who really wrote the plays? did he collaborate with others? did he work on King James’ version of the Bible (1611)?

Almost all are unanswerable, but they pale into insignificance in the face of the huge body of drama, eternal truths, characters and stories that make up his legacy.

First published on Suite 101, 22 September 2010.

Photo: Forbidden Love: West Side Story/Romeo & Juliet – Smatprt

Read On

 

Filed under: Articles at Suite 101

Movies and Pop Songs Draw Deep from the Wells of Classical Music

Classical Music Feeds Film Scores & Pop Songs - DaveMuskett
Far from being an exclusive, elitist world, classical music is a rich source of inspiration for movie soundtracks, TV commercials and popular songs.

A broad definition of classical music is: ‘Western and European art music created 1600-1900, and music created after 1900 that follows the style and tradition and is created for the sake of music itself – not as song melody nor movie score’.

Reusing old tunes is widespread; nothing is sacred in pop music or Hollywood. 1965’s Seekers’ hit The Carnival Is Over by Tom Springfield, used the melody of a Russian folk song Stenka Razin, though some hear Berlioz too. O solo mio, an 1898 Napolitan tune, found its way into opera, TV commercials and films and is in It’s Now or Never, Elvis Presley’s 1960’s hit.

Classical Music Feeds Movie Soundtracks

Some film/TV music is specially written, from sci-fi (Jerry Goldsmith: Star Trek, Alien, Twilight Zone Movie, Total Recall, Capricorn One and John Williams: Star Wars), to Westerns (Ennio Morricone: The Good , The Bad & The Ugly; Once Upon a Time in The West, A Fistful of Dynamite).

Classical music often appears directly in movies. Expert Aaron Green describes the most popular: Carl Orff’s Carmina Burana (O Fortuna), in Cheaper By the Dozen, Natural Born Killers, Excalibur and The Bachelor, British TV’s The X Factor and Puff Daddy’s 1999 song, Hate Me Now; and Franz Liszt’s Hungarian Rhapsody No. 2 in C-sharp minor (1946 cartoon Rhapsody Rabbit; Shine, Delirious and Who Framed Roger Rabbit).

Delibes’ The Flower Duet (coloratura soprano & mezzo-soprano) starred in British Airways’ TV 1980s campaign and in: The American President, Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life and Meet the Parents. Gershwin’s Rhapsody in Blue, jazz/classical fusion, found its way into Fantasia 2000 and Manhattan, while Dies Irae from Verdi’s Requiem was in Battle Royale and Water Drops on Burning Rocks. Mozart’s Dies Irae featured in X-Men 2, Duplex and The Incredibles DVD.

Puccini’s Nessun Dorma became a football anthem, marketing hallmark of The Three Tenors (Pavarotti, Domingo, Carreras) and in movies Man on Fire, Bend It Like Beckham and Chasing Liberty. The Funeral March from Beethoven’s 7th Symphony, which Green lauded: ‘Its ethereal melodic line gives listeners chills’, was in Mr. Holland’s Opus, Immortal Beloved, and Cowards Bend the Knee.

Wagner’s Ride of the Valkyries embellished Apocalypse Now, The Blues Brothers, and Full Metal Jacket. Grieg’s ‘Morning” from Peer Gynt was in Raising Cain and Soylent Green. The opening sequence of 2001: A Space Odyssey used Richard Strauss’ Also Sprach Zarathustra dramatically as the apes discovered bones as weapons. The Godfather Part III had Mascagni’s Cavalleria Rusticana; A Clockwork Orange took Elgar’s Pomp and Circumstance and JFK utilised Mozart’s Horn Concerto.

Pop Songs’ Raw Material

Classical music’s melodic structures used/reworked to create pop songs, can be controversial. In 1955, Tony Bennett’s Stranger in Paradise came from Borodin’s Polovtsian Dances, although covered by others; 1956 saw The Platters’ My Prayer from Boulanger’s Avant de Mourir, and in 1958, Perry Como hit with Catch a Falling Star, from Brahms’ Academic Festival Overture.

Petula Clark charted in 1961 with Romeo, from Salome by Austrian composer Robert Stolz. Martini’s Plaisir d’Amour provided Presley’s 1962 Can’t Help Falling in Love with later versions by Andy Williams (1970), Lick the Tins (1986), UB40 (1993). Nut Rocker (1962) by B Bumble & the Stingers was straight from Tchaikovsky’s Nutcracker Suite. Rondo from Kenny Ball & His Jazzmen (1963) came from Mozart’s Rondo.

Ken Dodd hit with 1964’s So Deep is the Night, from Chopin’s Etude in E; 1965 with Tears, from Saint-Saens, and again in 1966 with More Than Love from Beethoven’s Pathetique Sonata. Julie Rogers charted The Wedding in 1964, straight from Schubert’s Ave Maria; The Mindbenders (1966), Phil Collins (1988) with A Groovy Kind of Love, from Clementi.

Procul Harum’s 1967 A Whiter Shade of Pale borrowed from JS Bach; The Move’s Night of Fear took Tchaikovsky’s 1812 Overture; in 1968 Pachelbel’s Canon in D informed Aphrodite’s Child in Rain and Tears and later My Chemical Romance (Welcome to the Black Parade, 2006). Sabre Dance by Love Sculpture directly lifted Khachaturian’s Sabre Dance.

In 1972 Neil Diamond charted Song Sung Blue, from Mozart’s Piano Concerto No 21 (also in the movie Elvira Madigan); Steeleye Span’s Gaudete was from an anonymous piece written in 1582; Manfred Mann’s Earth Band 1973’s Joybringer came from Holst’s Planets (Jupiter); while Beethoven’s 5th Symphony gave Electric Light Orchestra their 1973 Roll Over Beethoven.

Annie’s Song by John Denver (1974) took from Tchaikovsky’s 5th Symphony; The Wombles used Mozart’s Symphony No 41 in Minuetto Allegretto; Greg Lake’s 1975 seasonal offering I Believe in Father Christmas arose from Prokofiev; Mike Oldfield’s In Dulci Jubilo (1975) came from a German tune of 1570, later used by Bach himself.

Eric Carmen (All By Myself, 1976; and Celine Dion 1996) used Rachmaninov’s Piano Concerto No 2; Barry Manilow (Could It Be Magic, 1978; and Take That, 1992) used Chopin’s Prelude in C minor; Iris Williams (He Was Beautiful, 1979) took Myers’ Cavatina (also used in the movie The Deer Hunter); the Beach Boys (Lady Lynda,1979) used chord progressions from Bach’s Jesu, Joy of Man’s Desiring.

An example of multi-use/recycling is If I Had You by the Korgis (1979), based on Rachmaninov’s Rhapsody, based on a Paganini theme, Caprice, used by Andrew Lloyd Webber in Variations, theme tune for Britain’s long-running TV arts programme, South Bank Show. The opening of Billy Joel’s 1983 hit Uptown Girl was strikingly similar to the start of Ravel’s Bolero.

Punk-rock-manager-svengali Malcolm McLaren sampled extracts of opera with pop-rock with Madam Butterfly (1983) and Johann Strauss in House of the Blue Danube (1989). Sting took instrumental breaks in Russians (1985) from Prokofiev. I Vow to Thee My Country came from Holst’s Planets (Jupiter), which in turn produced Kiri Te Kanawa’s World in Union (1991).

A technique often used is changing the original 3/4 time to 4/4, more suited to pop song beat, such as Janet Jackson’s Someone to Call My Lover taken from Gymnopedie No 1 by Erik Satie, and Lover’s Concerto, (The Toys, 1965) based on melody from Bach’s Minuet in G major.

Using past classics and melodies out of copyright, continues to be controversial, but lucrative.

First published on Suite 101, 22 September 2010.

Photo: Classical Music Feeds Film Scores & Pop Songs – DaveMuskett

Read On

Filed under: Articles at Suite 101

Past History is Key to the Present; Present is Key to the Future

What Do We Learn from History? - Nikater
The historical/heritage nostalgia industry is growing, yet history teaching is becoming a thing of the past. Should history be given new-found importance?

 

Politically, the need for people to know and learn from the past (their own and others’) is crucial. Whether it’s conflicts in the Middle East, India/Pakistan or Northern Ireland, without an understanding of local history, nobody progresses improvements.

Culturally, in religions/faiths, why/how/what people behave, wear, think is vital knowledge. Where grievances go back centuries, understanding causes of events is essential. It’s not easy to predict the future accurately, nor understand the present without a grasp of the past, nor see how movements flow in evolution, such as modernism to postmodernism.

Economically, cultural/historical tourism is part of a growth global industry. Even movie tourism has some element of historical enjoyment and re-enactment about it. So, is history teaching treated seriously enough on the curriculum, in the classroom?

History Repeats Itself

Big Brother’s mantra in George Orwell’s novel Nineteen-Eighty Four (1948): “He who controls the present, controls the past. He who controls the past, controls the future,” was chilling justification for authoritarianism, but a true statement of fact.

George Santayana (1863-1952) was a Spanish-American philosopher, essayist, novelist and aphorist, famous for truths, like, “only the dead have seen the end of war.” Perhaps his best known was, “those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” Variations are credited to many, from Chairman Mao to Lenin to Oscar Wilde (“We learn from history that we don’t learn from history”), but it’s also true.

Mistakes perpetuate, generation after generation, sometimes from collective inability to learn, like children learning the “hard way.” Irish playwright George Bernard Shaw (1856-1950) said, “If history repeats itself, and the unexpected always happens, how incapable must Man be of learning from experience.”

In sociology, history, events and stages of society repeating cyclically is The Social Cycle Theory, the opposite of social evolution theories, although even in cycles there can be social progress. More spirals, perhaps, than circles.

Why Study History?

Dr Steven Kreis, historian, philosopher, political scientist, teacher and author of The History Guide, answering Why Study History? in 2000 said at first glance, “What could history offer the business major, or web page development, psychology, pre-med, law student or shop-floor worker? Everything has history, even history itself has a history. We can’t escape the past. We celebrate the past all the time.”

He dismissed the argument that history study is to avoid past mistakes, as too simplistic. If it were so, then “war, poverty, injustice and immorality ought not to exist.” He also disagreed with the view that as everything repeats itself, the past holds the key to the future.

He said that history tells us about the now. “Everything has a history: ideas, wars, numbers, races, windsurfing, coal miners, pencils, motherhood and even toilet-training. All great writers and philosophers are best understood in terms of their historical contexts. Ideas have history. They undergo a process of development. They change, are modified, distributed or forgotten only to reappear years, decades or even centuries later.”

Peter N. Stearns of the American Historical Association rehearsed arguments in 1998 to justify history’s place in the educational curriculum, satisfying those who enjoy information, those who analyse people’s motives, and education funders: “Historians don’t perform heart transplants, improve highway design, or arrest criminals. In a society that quite correctly expects education to serve useful purposes, the functions of history can seem more difficult to define than those of engineering or medicine.”

For Stearn, “history is indispensable: to gain access to the laboratory of human experience.” It helps understanding peoples and society; how societies evolved; how change can be managed; the identity/value of personal, family and community history in social cohesion and citizenship, and a contribution to future moral understanding by reflecting on past morality.

English writer LP Hartley (1895-1972) said, ‘the past is a foreign country; they do things differently there.” That helps to explain, but not excuse, slavery, for example. The foundations of current tensions between Christianity and Islam were laid 12 centuries ago. Only with historical knowledge can forgiveness and new racial harmony be tackled.

Stearns also claimed that history study improves student assessment skills, such as evidence gathering, conflicting interpretations and past examples of change, helping to make better businesspeople, law/education professionals and political leaders.

History Teaching in UK Schools

The UK Historical Association, “the voice for history.” undertook in 2010 a major survey into history teaching in English secondary schools. Written by Katharine Burn (Institute of Education) and Richard Harris (Southampton University), it was a thorough study, demanding a response. The main findings were: “teachers report serious concerns that history is disappearing in their schools with senior managers assuming that the study of the past has no value in its own right.”

Schools increasingly subsume history into generic “humanities,” particularly as children move into Key Stage 4, GCSE exam phase. This, partly driven by results obsession, forces schools into “easier” subjects, reflects management’s desire for tidy programmes of study, in which controversial thinking and knowledge give way to mere skills.

Frank Lutmer of Hanover College, Indiana, in 1996 argued that ‘”the study of history is vital to a liberal arts education.” History is “the discipline most concerned with understanding change.” He focussed on the endurance of tradition, understanding the complex interplay between continuity and change, and the origins, evolution, and decline of institutions and ideas.

His final point is equally telling: “because it’s fun!”

First published on Suite 101, 18 September 2011.

Photo: What Do We Learn from History? – Nikater

Read On

Filed under: Articles at Suite 101